|
|
|
|
김봉정 ( Kim Bong-Jeong ) - 국군간호사관학교
유승연 ( Yoo Seung-Yeon ) - 국군간호사관학교
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
The purpose of the study was to assess how much the first and second lieutenant officers practice their health promoting lifestyle and to identify those related factors. The subjects were 888 the first and second lieutenant officers working at 8 infantry divisions, military schools, military hospitals in field or rear service area. The data were collected by self-administered questionnaire from August 10th to September 20th, 2002. The instruments used in this study were Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile developed by Walker et al., perceived health status scale developed by Ware et al., Self-efficacy scale developed by Sherer et al., Social support scale developed by Cohen et al., perceived profit scale and perceived interference scale developed by Moon Jung Soon. The data were analyzed by descritive statistics, t-test, ANOVA, Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient and Stepwise Multiple Regression by using the SPSS 10.0 program.
The results of this study were as follows:
1. The mean score of health promoting lifestyle was total 2.60, interpersonal support 2.98, self-actualization 2.98, stress management 2.40, nutrition 2.05, exercise 2.46, health responsibility 2.26. Interpersonal support and self-actualization showed the highest score and nutrition showed the lowest score. The mean score of perceived health status was 2.84, Self-efficacy was 2.91, Social support was 3.01, perceived profit was 3.13, and perceived interference scale was 2.27.
2. In the relationship between general characteristics of subjects and health promoting lifestyle there were significantly different according to rank(t=3.909, p=.000), sex(t=6.485, p=.000), troops(F=14.272, p=.000), religion(t=4.284, p=.000), living with family(F=3.780, p=.023), living area(F=21.403, p=.000), residence(F=4.705, p=.003), appointment classification(F=4.620, p=.001), duty(F=4.166, p=.000).
3. In the relationship between general characteristics of subjects and Self-efficacy there were significantly different according to rank(t=1.961, p=.050), sex(t=6.638, p=.000), religion(t=3.712, p=.000), troops(F=16.739, p=.000), living area(F=22.033, p=22.033), appointment classification(F=5.573. p=.000), duty(F=5.767, p=.000).
4. In the relationship between general characteristics of subjects and Social support there were significantly different according to rank(t=4.083, p=.000), sex(t=2.075, p=.038), troops(F=4.055, .007), living area(F=5.839 p= .003), duty(F=2.747, p=.005).
5. Perceived profit was showed significant negative correlations with age(r=-.080, p=.018).
6.In the relationship between general characteristics of subjects and perceived interference there were significantly different according to living area(F=3.894, p=.021).
7. Health promoting lifestyle was showed significant positive correlations with Self-efficacy(r=.605, p=.000), Social support(r=.532, p=.000), perceived profit(r=.318, p=.000), perceived health status(r=.268, p=.000), work satisfaction(r=.255, p=.000) and negative correlations with perceived interference(r=-.142, p=.000).
8. The combination of age, work satisfaction, perceived health status, self-efficacy, social support, perceived profit explained 46.5% of the variance of health promoting lifestyle and self-efficacy was the powerful factor((R²=.364, P=.000).
|
|
|
KeyWords
|
|
|
|
|
원문 및 링크아웃 정보
|
|
|
|
|
|
등재저널 정보
|
|
|
|
|
|
|